Wow this week seems to have flown by!
Now this episode is a little difficult to decipher.
Firstly I want to address the tweets and comments in regard to the tea party and as to whether Miss Resnick was invited. Now as often happens when one of us organizes an event, production arranges transport. I was informed that Kyle wanted to bring Faye.
Now I immediately rejected the idea in the aftermath of what had resulted at Kyle’s house previously. I had no intention of reenacting that scenario. So, I relayed my sentiments.
Apparently Faye was miffed. I could honestly care less and hoped that as she knew I didn’t want to include her. She would have the wherewithal to stay home. There was no place setting, a chair, yes, but no gift, no place setting, just one for Kim which was taken by Faye
When Taylor called Kyle, it was clear that she had been drinking. But I believe that there was some sort of misunderstanding. I recall Kyle telling me the nanny was going to collect her and a decision was made for Kennedy to stay, unbeknownst to Taylor.
Taylor believed that her daughter was being taken to her grandmothers, now I think that Kyle should have explained that, rather than us believing that Taylor was devoid of any knowledge as to the whereabouts of her daughter.
Witnessing my old house being burnt was sad to see on film. A plethora of memories going up in smoke. . .an end of an era. NOTE: Lisa’s entire house did not burn to the ground! June 30, 2012:
Then we see Adrienne and Paul in the car. She finally admitted that there was a letter, because at the tea party she vociferously denied it. Interesting that she also stated that she would never try to ruin somebody’s reputation. . .Mmm I think I have to disagree with that one. Anyway the whole situation was almost identical to last year’s fiasco. The charge had been led by Adrienne and Paul to ban Russell and Taylor, so where’s the difference? NOTE: There is a difference; however, this whole story line is getting very old. If you don’t know the difference by now… just look it up!
It seemed to me it shrieked of utter hypocrisy. It has been really hurtful and rather irritating at the vicious remarks that their cook has made about me constantly on Facebook and in the press. I was advised to ignore it but at times it has been challenging, Brandi has endured the same aggressive behavior and this has resulted in a mountain of resentment and confusion. NOTE: Calling Bernie a “cook”…Nice jab there, Lisa!!
I also couldn’t resist mentioning to Adrienne about the body make up. She leaves it like a trail behind her, which ultimately results in her being a rather expensive guest. I would have expected some sort of remorse or responsibility taken but no, “clean it with baby wipes” that was all I was told.
Ken was not happy with the intimidating letter. He believes that when you know people socially and are continuing to socialize with them, it is redundant to enter into litigation. So he voiced his opinion to Paul and suggested they pay her legal fees.
And so on it goes, this bumpy trail. . .stay with us as we continue. Until next week.
Love always, Lisa.